Stocking v Montila [2005] EWHC 2210 (Ch) (18 October 2005)

Stocking v Montila [2005] EWHC 2210 (Ch) (18 October 2005)

The court found that the partnership existed for the purchase, development, and resale of the Barn, that there was no cap on development expenditure, and that Mr Montila is entitled to credit for the value by which his expenditure and labour increased the value of the Barn, limited to the amount of the increase (£557,500). Mr Stocking is entitled to credit for his contributions (£68,160.63). Mr Montila must account for an occupation rent from March 2003, to be agreed or determined by the Master.

Citation
[2005] EWHC 2210 (Ch)
Parties
Claimant: Roy Stocking; Defendant: Steven William Montila
Jurisdiction
England and Wales
Judgment Date
18 October 2005
Procedural Posture
Partnership Account and Winding Up / Post Trial, Taking of Account After Liability Judgment
Outcome
Account taken; credits and liabilities determined; occupation rent to be agreed or determined; no order for sale.
Legal Topics
Partnership Dissolution, Accounting Between Partners, Equitable Allowances, Occupation Rent, Valuation of Partnership Assets
Partnership Law Equity Partnership Dissolution Accounting Between Partners Equitable Allowances Occupation Rent Valuation of Partnership Assets

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 2 Authorities cited 3 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 6
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Roy Stocking

Claimant

Steven William Montila

Defendant

Procedural Posture

Partnership Account and Winding Up / Post Trial, Taking of Account After Liability Judgment

Legal Issues

  1. 1 Whether there was a partnership between the parties in relation to the Barn; extent of each party's financial and non-financial contributions; entitlement to credit for expenditure and labour; whether a cap existed on development expenditure; whether occupation rent is payable by a partner in occupation; appropriate valuation date for partnership asset division.

Ratio Decidendi

The court found that the partnership existed for the purchase, development, and resale of the Barn, that there was no cap on development expenditure, and that Mr Montila is entitled to credit for the value by which his expenditure and labour increased the value of the Barn, limited to the amount of the increase (£557,500). Mr Stocking is entitled to credit for his contributions (£68,160.63). Mr Montila must account for an occupation rent from March 2003, to be agreed or determined by the Master.

Court Disposition

Account taken; credits and liabilities determined; occupation rent to be agreed or determined; no order for sale.

Orders

  • Mr Montila entitled to credit for £557,500 (improvement value) in the partnership account.
  • Mr Stocking entitled to credit for £68,160.63 (contributions).