Stevens v Hotel Portfolio II UK Ltd (In Liquidation) and another
A dishonest assistant who assists in the dissipation of trust property held on constructive trust for unauthorised profits is jointly liable with the trustee to compensate the beneficiary for the loss of its proprietary interest, regardless of whether the profits were themselves the result of an earlier breach and regardless of any set-off argument. The constructive trust is a real trust, not merely a remedy, and the loss is assessed by reference to the value of the property dissipated.
- Parties
- Respondent: Stevens; Appellants: Hotel Portfolio II UK Ltd (In Liquidation) and another
- Jurisdiction
- England and Wales
- Judgment Date
- 23 July 2025
- Procedural Posture
- Appeal / Supreme Court Judgment
- Outcome
- Appeal allowed (majority); order of trial judge restored. Dissent: appeal dismissed.
- Legal Topics
- Constructive Trusts, Dishonest Assistance, Fiduciary Duty, Equitable Compensation, Account of Profits, Set Off in Breach of Trust
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Stevens
Respondent
Hotel Portfolio II UK Ltd (In Liquidation) and another
Appellants
Procedural Posture
Appeal / Supreme Court Judgment
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether a dishonest assistant to a constructive trustee is liable to compensate the beneficiary for loss caused by dissipation of trust property representing unauthorised profits
- 2 Whether compensation can be ordered for breach of a constructive trust of unauthorised profits
- 3 Whether equitable set-off applies to gains and losses from connected breaches of trust
Ratio Decidendi
A dishonest assistant who assists in the dissipation of trust property held on constructive trust for unauthorised profits is jointly liable with the trustee to compensate the beneficiary for the loss of its proprietary interest, regardless of whether the profits were themselves the result of an earlier breach and regardless of any set-off argument. The constructive trust is a real trust, not merely a remedy, and the loss is assessed by reference to the value of the property dissipated.
Court Disposition
Appeal allowed (majority); order of trial judge restored. Dissent: appeal dismissed.
Orders
- Mr Stevens is ordered to compensate HPII for the loss caused by dissipation of the trust property representing unauthorised profits.
- No set-off allowed against the loss caused by dissipation.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment