Stocker v Stocker [2013] EWCA Civ 628 (24 March 2015)
The applicant failed to demonstrate any error of law, misdirection, or unreasonable conclusion by the trial judge. The judge's decision was within his discretion and based on the evidence and agreement reached by the parties. There was no real prospect of success in the appeal.
Source-derived case information.
- Citation
- [2013] EWCA Civ 628
- Parties
- Applicant: Stocker; Respondent: Stocker
- Jurisdiction
- England and Wales
- Judgment Date
- 24 March 2015
- Procedural Posture
- Family Law Financial Remedy / Renewed Application for Permission to Appeal Out of Time
- Outcome
- Application for permission to appeal out of time refused; renewed application dismissed.
- Legal Topics
- Financial Relief After Divorce, Division of Assets, Permission to Appeal, Out of Time Applications
Source-derived case record
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Stocker
Applicant
Stocker
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Family Law Financial Remedy / Renewed Application for Permission to Appeal Out of Time
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether permission to appeal out of time should be granted in relation to a financial remedy order following divorce
- 2 Whether the trial judge erred in law or principle in the division of assets
Ratio Decidendi
The applicant failed to demonstrate any error of law, misdirection, or unreasonable conclusion by the trial judge. The judge's decision was within his discretion and based on the evidence and agreement reached by the parties. There was no real prospect of success in the appeal.
Court Disposition
Application for permission to appeal out of time refused; renewed application dismissed.
Orders
- Application refused
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment