Michelle Andrea Hargreaves (styling herself as The Lord Jesus Christ) v The District Probate Court, Lessors, Reversioners and/or Tenants in Possession or Persons Respectively

Michelle Andrea Hargreaves (styling herself as The Lord Jesus Christ) v The District Probate Court, Lessors, Reversioners and/or Tenants in Possession or Persons Respectively

The claim form discloses no reasonable grounds for bringing the claim, and the application to set aside the previous order is totally without merit.

Parties
Claimant: Michelle Andrea Hargreaves (styling herself as ‘THE LORD JESUS CHRIST’); Defendants: The District Probate Court, Lessors, Reversioners and/or Tenants in Possession or Persons Respectively
Jurisdiction
England and Wales
Judgment Date
27 June 2022
Procedural Posture
Civil / Application to Set Aside Order Striking Out Claim
Outcome
application to set aside previous order refused; claim remains struck out
Legal Topics
Striking Out, Civil Restraint Order, Registration of Births

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 3 Authorities cited 5 Party arguments 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Michelle Andrea Hargreaves (styling herself as ‘THE LORD JESUS CHRIST’)

Claimant

The District Probate Court, Lessors, Reversioners and/or Tenants in Possession or Persons Respectively

Defendants

Procedural Posture

Civil / Application to Set Aside Order Striking Out Claim

  1. 1 Whether the claim discloses reasonable grounds for bringing the claim
  2. 2 Whether the application to set aside the previous order should be allowed
  3. 3 Whether a civil restraint order should be made

Ratio Decidendi

The claim form discloses no reasonable grounds for bringing the claim, and the application to set aside the previous order is totally without merit.

Court Disposition

application to set aside previous order refused; claim remains struck out

Orders

  • Application to vary previous order is set aside
  • Claim remains struck out