Hargrave & Anor, R. (On the Application of) v Stroud District Council [2002] EWCA Civ 1281 (22 July 2002)
The local authority has discretion under section 119 of the Highways Act 1980 both to make and to submit a public path diversion order to the Secretary of State. There is no statutory duty to proceed with submission once an order is made, and the Council's decision not to submit the order was lawful and not irrational.
- Citation
- [2002] EWCA Civ 1281
- Parties
- Appellants: Hargrave and Hargrave; Respondent: Stroud District Council
- Jurisdiction
- England and Wales
- Judgment Date
- 22 July 2002
- Procedural Posture
- Judicial Review Appeal / Court of Appeal (civil Division) Judgment
- Outcome
- Appeal dismissed
- Legal Topics
- Footpath Diversion Orders, Statutory Interpretation, Discretion of Local Authorities, Judicial Review, Human Rights Act 1998
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Hargrave and Hargrave
Appellants
Stroud District Council
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Judicial Review Appeal / Court of Appeal (civil Division) Judgment
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether a local authority is under a duty to submit a public path diversion order to the Secretary of State once made under section 119 of the Highways Act 1980
- 2 Whether the Council's refusal to submit the order was irrational or perverse
- 3 Whether the Human Rights Act 1998 or the European Convention on Human Rights affects the statutory construction or outcome
Ratio Decidendi
The local authority has discretion under section 119 of the Highways Act 1980 both to make and to submit a public path diversion order to the Secretary of State. There is no statutory duty to proceed with submission once an order is made, and the Council's decision not to submit the order was lawful and not irrational.
Court Disposition
Appeal dismissed
Orders
- Appeal dismissed with costs, such costs to be assessed if not agreed
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment