Brook v Green
The guarantee expressly excluded any right of discharge for omissions by the creditor, including failure to register the charge. The respondent, as director, was responsible for registration and cannot rely on his own default. All loans were made by or on behalf of the petitioner and are within the guarantee. The interest rate of 3% per month compounded applies to all loans. The petitioner is not fully secured; even after valuing the security, a substantial debt remains due. The statutory demand was overstated but the debt exceeds the bankruptcy threshold. The petition succeeds.
- Parties
- Petitioner: Eric Arthur Brook; Respondent: Stuart Andrew Green
- Jurisdiction
- England and Wales
- Judgment Date
- 08 February 2006
- Procedural Posture
- Bankruptcy Petition / Contested Final Hearing and Judgment
- Outcome
- Bankruptcy order made against respondent
- Legal Topics
- Bankruptcy Petition, Personal Guarantee, Loss of Security, Interest Calculation, Statutory Demand, Company Charges, Set Off and Counterclaim
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Eric Arthur Brook
Petitioner
Stuart Andrew Green
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Bankruptcy Petition / Contested Final Hearing and Judgment
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the guarantee is discharged pro tanto by loss of security due to non-registration of company charge
- 2 Whether the sums claimed are due from the respondent under the guarantee
- 3 Whether the interest claimed is due and at what rate
Ratio Decidendi
The guarantee expressly excluded any right of discharge for omissions by the creditor, including failure to register the charge. The respondent, as director, was responsible for registration and cannot rely on his own default. All loans were made by or on behalf of the petitioner and are within the guarantee. The interest rate of 3% per month compounded applies to all loans. The petitioner is not fully secured; even after valuing the security, a substantial debt remains due. The statutory demand was overstated but the debt exceeds the bankruptcy threshold. The petition succeeds.
Court Disposition
Bankruptcy order made against respondent
Orders
- Bankruptcy order against Stuart Andrew Green
- Petitioner to file amended petition to comply with procedural rules
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment