Taylor v Chesworth & Anor [2007] EWHC 1001 (QB) (30 April 2007)
It is reasonable to provide Mark Taylor with substantial periods of 24-hour care, with reductions to 16 and 8 hours per day as risks are managed, based on his severe brain injury, unpredictable behaviour, and likelihood of future crises. In-patient care is not presently required but may be necessary during major...
Source-derived case information.
- Citation
- [2007] EWHC 1001 (QB)
- Parties
- Claimant: Mark Calvin Taylor; Litigation Friend: Andrew Cusworth; Defendant: Stuart Chesworth; Second Defendant: The Motor Insurers' Bureau
- Jurisdiction
- England and Wales
- Judgment Date
- 30 April 2007
- Procedural Posture
- Personal Injury / Quantum Determination Following Consent Judgment on Liability
- Outcome
- Court approves settlement and quantum proposals for care, case management, professional support, and accommodation, subject to structuring of care hours as specified.
- Legal Topics
- Assessment of Damages, Care Costs, Case Management, Accommodation Costs, Periodic Payment Orders, Brain Injury, Reasonable Needs Test
Source-derived case record
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Mark Calvin Taylor
Claimant
Andrew Cusworth
Litigation Friend
Stuart Chesworth
Defendant
The Motor Insurers' Bureau
Second Defendant
Procedural Posture
Personal Injury / Quantum Determination Following Consent Judgment on Liability
Legal Issues
- 1 What is the reasonable future care regime for Mark Taylor?
- 2 Is in-patient care required and for what duration?
- 3 What are the appropriate costs for care, case management, professional support, and accommodation?
Ratio Decidendi
It is reasonable to provide Mark Taylor with substantial periods of 24-hour care, with reductions to 16 and 8 hours per day as risks are managed, based on his severe brain injury, unpredictable behaviour, and likelihood of future crises. In-patient care is not presently required but may be necessary during major crises. Accommodation must be suitable for care regime. The claimant's proposal for 24-hour care is reasonable for a significant period but not indefinitely.
Court Disposition
Court approves settlement and quantum proposals for care, case management, professional support, and accommodation, subject to structuring of care hours as specified.
Orders
- 24-hour care to be provided for a substantial period, then reduced to 16 and 8 hours per day as appropriate.
- Accommodation to be provided suitable for care regime.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment