IBM United Kingdom Holdings Ltd & Anor v Dalgleish & Ors (Rev 2)
IBM breached its contractual duty of trust and confidence and the Imperial duty by procuring NPAs and serving Exclusion Notices as part of Project Waltz, thereby disappointing members' reasonable expectations regarding pensionable salary increases and early retirement policy. The NPAs were not themselves contracts but, when implemented, the non-pensionability term was incorporated into employment contracts in breach of duty. The Exclusion Notices were voidable, not void, and could be set aside at the election of affected members. Members are entitled to have salary increases treated as pensionable (subject to prior partial NPAs), to damages or equitable compensation for proven loss, and...
- Parties
- Claimant: IBM United Kingdom Holdings Limited; Claimant: IBM United Kingdom Limited; Defendant: Stuart Dalgleish; Defendant: Lizanne Harrison; Defendant: IBM United Kingdom Pensions Trust Limited
- Jurisdiction
- England and Wales
- Judgment Date
- 20 February 2015
- Procedural Posture
- Civil (pensions/employment/trusts) / Remedies Judgment Following Main Liability Judgment
- Outcome
- Declarations granted; Exclusion Notices voidable and set aside at member election; salary increases pensionable; damages and equitable compensation available in principle; waivers under redundancy programmes effective to bar certain claims; further consultation required before future exclusions; Trustee to...
- Legal Topics
- Implied Contractual Duty of Trust and Confidence, Imperial Duty (pensions Context), Breach of Duty by Employer, Remedies for Breach of Trust and Contract, Validity and Enforceability of Non Pensionability Agreements (npas), Void/voidable/unenforceable Contracts, Exclusion Notices Under Pension Schemes, Early Retirement Policy and Reasonable Expectations, Consultation Obligations Under Pension Law, Severance and Partial Rescission, Equitable Compensation, Damages for Breach of Contract
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
IBM United Kingdom Holdings Limited
Claimant
IBM United Kingdom Limited
Claimant
Stuart Dalgleish
Defendant
Lizanne Harrison
Defendant
IBM United Kingdom Pensions Trust Limited
Defendant
Procedural Posture
Civil (pensions/employment/trusts) / Remedies Judgment Following Main Liability Judgment
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the 2009, 2010, and 2011 Non-Pensionability Agreements (NPAs) were void, voidable, unenforceable, or valid;
- 2 Whether IBM breached its contractual and/or Imperial duty in procuring NPAs and serving Exclusion Notices;
- 3 Whether salary increases awarded under NPAs are pensionable;
Ratio Decidendi
IBM breached its contractual duty of trust and confidence and the Imperial duty by procuring NPAs and serving Exclusion Notices as part of Project Waltz, thereby disappointing members' reasonable expectations regarding pensionable salary increases and early retirement policy. The NPAs were not themselves contracts but, when implemented, the non-pensionability term was incorporated into employment contracts in breach of duty. The Exclusion Notices were voidable, not void, and could be set aside at the election of affected members. Members are entitled to have salary increases treated as pensionable (subject to prior partial NPAs), to damages or equitable compensation for proven loss, and...
Court Disposition
Declarations granted; Exclusion Notices voidable and set aside at member election; salary increases pensionable; damages and equitable compensation available in principle; waivers under redundancy programmes effective to bar certain claims; further consultation required before future exclusions; Trustee to...
Orders
- Exclusion Notices declared voidable and set aside at election of affected members;
- Trustee to administer DB Plans as if affected members remained in pensionable service unless and until valid exclusion;
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment