Reid, R. v [2019] EWCA Crim 690 (09 April 2019)
Reid's beneficial interest in 14 Church Lane is reduced from 75% to 50%, reflecting his substantial financial contributions and wider involvement, but recognising Miss Griffiths' equitable interest. The judge's findings on Miss Griffiths' lack of credible evidence and Reid's payment of mortgage were justified. There was no inconsistency between tainted gifts and beneficial interest findings.
- Citation
- [2019] EWCA Crim 690
- Parties
- Prosecutor: Regina; Appellant: Stuart Reid; Intervener: Jayne Griffiths
- Jurisdiction
- England and Wales
- Judgment Date
- 09 April 2019
- Procedural Posture
- Criminal Appeal / Court of Appeal (criminal Division) Judgment
- Outcome
- Appeal allowed in part
- Legal Topics
- Confiscation Order, Beneficial Interest, Resulting Trust, Tainted Gifts
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Regina
Prosecutor
Stuart Reid
Appellant
Jayne Griffiths
Intervener
Procedural Posture
Criminal Appeal / Court of Appeal (criminal Division) Judgment
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether Stuart Reid had a beneficial interest in 14 Church Lane after 10 January 2004 and in what amount
- 2 Whether Miss Griffiths had sufficient income to pay the mortgage and contributed to repayments
- 3 Whether the judge erred in quantifying Reid's beneficial interest as 75%
Ratio Decidendi
Reid's beneficial interest in 14 Church Lane is reduced from 75% to 50%, reflecting his substantial financial contributions and wider involvement, but recognising Miss Griffiths' equitable interest. The judge's findings on Miss Griffiths' lack of credible evidence and Reid's payment of mortgage were justified. There was no inconsistency between tainted gifts and beneficial interest findings.
Court Disposition
Appeal allowed in part
Orders
- Reid's beneficial interest in 14 Church Lane reduced from 75% to 50%
- Schedule of assets amended to reflect 50% share (£325,000)
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment