Reid, R. v

Reid, R. v

Reid's beneficial interest in 14 Church Lane is reduced from 75% to 50% based on his substantial financial contributions and wider involvement, but recognising Miss Griffiths' equitable interest and the course of dealings between the parties.

Parties
Prosecutor: Regina; Appellant: Stuart Reid; Intervener: Jayne Griffiths
Jurisdiction
England and Wales
Judgment Date
09 April 2019
Procedural Posture
Criminal Appeal / Court of Appeal Judgment
Outcome
Appeal allowed in part
Legal Topics
Confiscation Order, Beneficial Interest, Resulting Trust, Tainted Gifts
Criminal Law Proceeds of Crime Confiscation Order Beneficial Interest Resulting Trust Tainted Gifts

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 2 Authorities cited 2 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 6
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Regina

Prosecutor

Stuart Reid

Appellant

Jayne Griffiths

Intervener

Procedural Posture

Criminal Appeal / Court of Appeal Judgment

Legal Issues

  1. 1 Whether Reid had a beneficial interest in 14 Church Lane after 10 January 2004 and its quantification
  2. 2 Whether Miss Griffiths had sufficient income to pay the mortgage
  3. 3 Whether contributions by Reid were tainted gifts or acquired a beneficial interest

Ratio Decidendi

Reid's beneficial interest in 14 Church Lane is reduced from 75% to 50% based on his substantial financial contributions and wider involvement, but recognising Miss Griffiths' equitable interest and the course of dealings between the parties.

Court Disposition

Appeal allowed in part

Orders

  • Reid's beneficial interest in 14 Church Lane reduced from 75% to 50%
  • Schedule of assets amended to reflect £325,000 for Reid's share