Sukhwinder Singh v Makhan Singh Bains & Anor

Sukhwinder Singh v Makhan Singh Bains & Anor

The trial judge was entitled to find, on the balance of probabilities, that there was no oral agreement for the appellant to receive a 50% shareholding in GB Retail Limited. The judge's assessment of the evidence and credibility was rationally supportable, and there was no failure to consider compelling evidence. The appeal is dismissed.

Parties
Appellant: Sukhwinder Singh; Respondent: Makhan Singh Bains; Respondent: GB Retail Limited
Jurisdiction
England and Wales
Judgment Date
01 April 2026
Procedural Posture
Civil Appeal / Judgment on Appeal
Outcome
appeal dismissed
Legal Topics
Specific Performance, Oral Agreements, Shareholder Disputes, Unfair Prejudice, Burden of Proof, Credibility of Witnesses
Company Law Contract Law Specific Performance Oral Agreements Shareholder Disputes Unfair Prejudice Burden of Proof Credibility of Witnesses

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 3 Authorities cited 7 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 3
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Sukhwinder Singh

Appellant

Makhan Singh Bains

Respondent

GB Retail Limited

Respondent

Procedural Posture

Civil Appeal / Judgment on Appeal

Legal Issues

  1. 1 Whether there was an enforceable oral agreement for the appellant to receive 50% of the shares in GB Retail Limited
  2. 2 Whether the trial judge failed to consider relevant evidence or misapplied the burden of proof
  3. 3 Whether the trial judge's assessment of witness credibility was rationally supportable

Ratio Decidendi

The trial judge was entitled to find, on the balance of probabilities, that there was no oral agreement for the appellant to receive a 50% shareholding in GB Retail Limited. The judge's assessment of the evidence and credibility was rationally supportable, and there was no failure to consider compelling evidence. The appeal is dismissed.

Court Disposition

appeal dismissed