Al-Sayed, R v
The custodial sentence imposed was within the appropriate range given the aggravating features, including the age of the victim and pre-planning, but the recommendation for deportation was quashed as the conviction alone did not establish that the appellant's continued presence was detrimental to society.
- Parties
- Prosecution: Regina; Appellant: Sultan Al-Sayed
- Jurisdiction
- England and Wales
- Judgment Date
- 28 August 2009
- Procedural Posture
- Criminal Appeal / Appeal Against Sentence
- Outcome
- appeal allowed in part
- Legal Topics
- Voyeurism, Sentencing, Deportation Recommendation, Sexual Offences, Appeal Procedure
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Regina
Prosecution
Sultan Al-Sayed
Appellant
Procedural Posture
Criminal Appeal / Appeal Against Sentence
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the sentence imposed for attempted voyeurism was manifestly excessive
- 2 Whether the recommendation for deportation was appropriate
Ratio Decidendi
The custodial sentence imposed was within the appropriate range given the aggravating features, including the age of the victim and pre-planning, but the recommendation for deportation was quashed as the conviction alone did not establish that the appellant's continued presence was detrimental to society.
Court Disposition
appeal allowed in part
Orders
- recommendation for deportation quashed
- prison sentence and ancillary orders to remain
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment