Cotton (t/a Allmat Enterprises) v Rickard Metals Inc

Cotton (t/a Allmat Enterprises) v Rickard Metals Inc

The evidence was not so clear-cut as to justify summary judgment; there were unresolved factual disputes and new evidence that could support the defence. The Master erred in conducting a mini-trial and relying on incomplete evidence. The appeal is allowed and the summary judgment set aside.

Parties
Appellant/defendant: Daniel Charles Cotton (Trading as Allmat Enterprises); Respondent/claimant: Rickard Metals Inc
Jurisdiction
England and Wales
Judgment Date
21 April 2008
Procedural Posture
Civil / Appeal Against Summary Judgment
Outcome
appeal allowed; summary judgment set aside
Legal Topics
Summary Judgment, Sale of Goods, Breach of Contract, Evidence Admissibility

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 3 Authorities cited 7 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Daniel Charles Cotton (Trading as Allmat Enterprises)

Appellant/defendant

Rickard Metals Inc

Respondent/claimant

Procedural Posture

Civil / Appeal Against Summary Judgment

  1. 1 Whether summary judgment was properly granted on the issue of non-compliance with contractual description under s.13 Sale of Goods Act 1979
  2. 2 Whether the evidence was sufficient to show no real prospect of defending the claim
  3. 3 Whether new evidence should be admitted on appeal

Ratio Decidendi

The evidence was not so clear-cut as to justify summary judgment; there were unresolved factual disputes and new evidence that could support the defence. The Master erred in conducting a mini-trial and relying on incomplete evidence. The appeal is allowed and the summary judgment set aside.

Court Disposition

appeal allowed; summary judgment set aside

Orders

  • Order for summary judgment set aside
  • Matter to proceed to trial on the issue of non-compliance