NAP Anglia Ltd v Sun -Land Development Co Ltd (No. 2)
Costs incurred by claims consultants assisting solicitors in enforcement proceedings are recoverable if directly attributable to the application and reasonable in amount; indemnity costs are not justified given partial success and conduct; 85% of NAP's costs are to be paid by Sun-Land.
- Parties
- Claimant: NAP Anglia Ltd; Defendant: Sun-Land Development Co. Ltd
- Jurisdiction
- England and Wales
- Judgment Date
- 23 January 2012
- Procedural Posture
- Application for Summary Judgment and Costs Enforcement / Post Judgment Costs Assessment
- Outcome
- Costs assessed and awarded; indemnity costs refused; 85% of NAP's costs to be paid by Sun-Land.
- Legal Topics
- Adjudication Enforcement, Costs Assessment, Indemnity Costs, Third Party Costs Recovery
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
NAP Anglia Ltd
Claimant
Sun-Land Development Co. Ltd
Defendant
Procedural Posture
Application for Summary Judgment and Costs Enforcement / Post Judgment Costs Assessment
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether costs should be awarded on an indemnity basis
- 2 Whether costs incurred by claims consultants are recoverable
- 3 Appropriate proportion of costs to be paid by the defendant
Ratio Decidendi
Costs incurred by claims consultants assisting solicitors in enforcement proceedings are recoverable if directly attributable to the application and reasonable in amount; indemnity costs are not justified given partial success and conduct; 85% of NAP's costs are to be paid by Sun-Land.
Court Disposition
Costs assessed and awarded; indemnity costs refused; 85% of NAP's costs to be paid by Sun-Land.
Orders
- Sun-Land to pay 85% of NAP's costs as assessed.
- Sums assessed as recoverable to be paid within 14 days.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment