Athena Brands Ltd v Superdrug Stores Plc

Athena Brands Ltd v Superdrug Stores Plc

The emails objectively evidenced a binding commitment by Superdrug to purchase minimum quantities, the buyer had ostensible authority, and there was no real prospect of the defences succeeding; summary judgment was granted for Athena.

Parties
Claimant: Athena Brands Ltd; Defendant: Superdrug Stores Plc
Jurisdiction
England and Wales
Judgment Date
18 December 2019
Procedural Posture
Commercial / Summary Judgment Application
Outcome
Summary judgment for claimant
Legal Topics
Formation of Contract, Authority of Agents, Intention to Create Legal Relations, Summary Judgment
Contract Law Commercial Law Formation of Contract Authority of Agents Intention to Create Legal Relations Summary Judgment

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 3 Authorities cited 1 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Athena Brands Ltd

Claimant

Superdrug Stores Plc

Defendant

Procedural Posture

Commercial / Summary Judgment Application

Legal Issues

  1. 1 Whether a binding contract was formed by email exchange committing Superdrug to purchase minimum quantities
  2. 2 Whether Superdrug's employee had authority to bind Superdrug
  3. 3 Whether there was intention to create legal relations

Ratio Decidendi

The emails objectively evidenced a binding commitment by Superdrug to purchase minimum quantities, the buyer had ostensible authority, and there was no real prospect of the defences succeeding; summary judgment was granted for Athena.

Court Disposition

Summary judgment for claimant

Orders

  • Summary judgment granted for Athena Brands Ltd
  • Further directions to be agreed or listed for hearing if not agreed