Deman v University Of Bradford & Ors [2002] EWCA Civ 1455 (25 September 2002)
Adjournment granted to allow applicant to secure public funding and representation by counsel, and to ensure skeleton arguments are prepared; appeal in Bradford case likely overtaken by events but adjourned for comprehensive advice.
- Citation
- [2002] EWCA Civ 1455
- Parties
- Applicant: Suresh Deman; Respondents: University of Bradford and Others; Respondents: Association of University Teachers
- Jurisdiction
- England and Wales
- Judgment Date
- 25 September 2002
- Procedural Posture
- Application for Permission to Appeal and Extension of Time / Application for Permission to Appeal; Adjournment Application
- Outcome
- Applications for permission to appeal adjourned for one month; not to be relisted before 26th October 2002.
- Legal Topics
- Race Discrimination, Victimisation, Adjournment of Hearings, Legal Aid/public Funding, Jurisdiction and Transfer of Proceedings
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Suresh Deman
Applicant
University of Bradford and Others
Respondents
Association of University Teachers
Respondents
Procedural Posture
Application for Permission to Appeal and Extension of Time / Application for Permission to Appeal; Adjournment Application
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether permission to appeal should be granted in two employment discrimination cases
- 2 Whether adjournment should be granted to allow applicant to secure public funding and counsel
- 3 Whether appeal regarding transfer and adjournment in the Bradford case is now academic
Ratio Decidendi
Adjournment granted to allow applicant to secure public funding and representation by counsel, and to ensure skeleton arguments are prepared; appeal in Bradford case likely overtaken by events but adjourned for comprehensive advice.
Court Disposition
Applications for permission to appeal adjourned for one month; not to be relisted before 26th October 2002.
Orders
- Applications adjourned for one month; not to be relisted before 26th October 2002.
- Skeleton arguments to be submitted in support of both applications.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment