Markel International Insurance Company Ltd v Surety Guarantee Consultants Ltd & Ors
The defendants, in particular Higgins, Felstead, and Brunswick, conspired to defraud the claimants by writing bonds in excess of agreed limits, misrepresenting exposures, failing to account for premium, and making secret profits. Williams was reckless and dishonest but not a party to the conspiracy. The 'silent co-surety' arrangement was a sham. The claimants did not authorise or ratify the breaches. All four are liable for losses and secret profits arising from unauthorised bonds.
- Parties
- Claimant: Markel International Insurance Company Limited; Claimant: QBE Insurance (Europe) Limited; Claimant: Amalfi Underwriting Limited; Defendant: Surety Guarantee Consultants Limited; Defendant: Timothy Patrick Thomas Higgins; Defendant: Barry Williams; Defendant: Clifford Edward Felstead; Defendant: Ralph Brunswick; Defendant: General Commercial Limited
- Jurisdiction
- England and Wales
- Judgment Date
- 03 June 2008
- Procedural Posture
- Commercial Fraud / Insurance / Civil / Final Judgment After Trial
- Outcome
- Judgment for the claimants. Defendants found liable for conspiracy, breach of fiduciary duty, procuring breach of contract, and dishonest assistance. Inquiry as to damages and account of secret profits ordered.
- Legal Topics
- Fraud, Breach of Fiduciary Duty, Conspiracy, Dishonest Assistance, Procuring Breach of Contract, Surety Bonds, Binding Authority, Secret Profits, Tracing, Constructive Trust
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Markel International Insurance Company Limited
Claimant
QBE Insurance (Europe) Limited
Claimant
Amalfi Underwriting Limited
Claimant
Surety Guarantee Consultants Limited
Defendant
Timothy Patrick Thomas Higgins
Defendant
Barry Williams
Defendant
Clifford Edward Felstead
Defendant
Ralph Brunswick
Defendant
General Commercial Limited
Defendant
Procedural Posture
Commercial Fraud / Insurance / Civil / Final Judgment After Trial
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the defendants practised a fraud on the claimants in connection with the writing of surety bonds
- 2 Whether the defendants breached fiduciary duties, conspired to defraud, dishonestly assisted breaches of trust, or procured breaches of contract
- 3 Whether the defendants are liable for secret profits and losses arising from unauthorised bonds
Ratio Decidendi
The defendants, in particular Higgins, Felstead, and Brunswick, conspired to defraud the claimants by writing bonds in excess of agreed limits, misrepresenting exposures, failing to account for premium, and making secret profits. Williams was reckless and dishonest but not a party to the conspiracy. The 'silent co-surety' arrangement was a sham. The claimants did not authorise or ratify the breaches. All four are liable for losses and secret profits arising from unauthorised bonds.
Court Disposition
Judgment for the claimants. Defendants found liable for conspiracy, breach of fiduciary duty, procuring breach of contract, and dishonest assistance. Inquiry as to damages and account of secret profits ordered.
Orders
- Inquiry as to damages and indemnity for future losses
- Account and payment of secret profits
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment