SJ & Anor, R (on the application of) v Surrey County Council

The Defendant's current assessment that SJ is not a child in need is within the range of reasonable responses open to the authority; there is no evidence of apparent bias in the assessment process.

Parties: Claimant: SJ; Claimant: LJ; Defendant: Surrey County Council
Jurisdiction: England and Wales
Judgment Date: 26 February 2014
Procedural Posture: Judicial Review / Final Judgment
Outcome: Applications for substantive relief and permission dismissed.
Legal Topics: Children in Need, Section 17 Children Act 1989, Judicial Review, Wednesbury Unreasonableness, Apparent Bias

Administrative Law Child Welfare Children in Need Section 17 Children Act 1989 Judicial Review Wednesbury Unreasonableness Apparent Bias

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 4 Authorities cited 7 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 7

Parties

Claimant

Surrey County Council

Defendant

Procedural Posture

Judicial Review / Final Judgment

Legal Issues

1 Whether SJ is a 'child in need' under section 17 of the Children Act 1989
2 Whether the Defendant's assessment was unreasonable (Wednesbury unreasonableness)
3 Whether the Defendant's assessment was tainted by apparent bias

Ratio Decidendi

The Defendant's current assessment that SJ is not a child in need is within the range of reasonable responses open to the authority; there is no evidence of apparent bias in the assessment process.

Court Disposition

Applications for substantive relief and permission dismissed.