Surrey County Council v LV & Ors
The Local Authority failed to prove on the balance of probabilities that either parent inflicted a non-accidental injury or failed to disclose a witnessed accident. The evidence did not establish that the injury was non-accidental, and the parents' accounts were credible and consistent. The medical evidence regarding causation and force required for such injuries in infants was uncertain. There were no risk factors present and multiple protective factors. The injury is unexplained but may have resulted from an unwitnessed accident possibly involving sibling B.
- Parties
- Applicant: Surrey County Council; Mother/respondent: LV; Father/respondent: FM; Children/respondents: A, B and C (Children by their Children’s Guardian)
- Jurisdiction
- England and Wales
- Judgment Date
- 13 October 2025
- Procedural Posture
- Public Law Children Proceedings (fact Finding) / Fact Finding Hearing
- Outcome
- Local Authority's allegations not proved; no findings of non-accidental injury or failure to disclose accidental injury against either parent.
- Legal Topics
- Non Accidental Injury, Burden of Proof, Expert Evidence, Pool of Perpetrators, Threshold Criteria
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Surrey County Council
Applicant
LV
Mother/respondent
FM
Father/respondent
A, B and C (Children by their Children’s Guardian)
Children/respondents
Procedural Posture
Public Law Children Proceedings (fact Finding) / Fact Finding Hearing
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the skull fracture and bruising sustained by child C were caused accidentally, non-accidentally, or remain unexplained
- 2 Whether either parent inflicted or failed to prevent the injury
- 3 Whether the Local Authority has discharged the burden of proof
Ratio Decidendi
The Local Authority failed to prove on the balance of probabilities that either parent inflicted a non-accidental injury or failed to disclose a witnessed accident. The evidence did not establish that the injury was non-accidental, and the parents' accounts were credible and consistent. The medical evidence regarding causation and force required for such injuries in infants was uncertain. There were no risk factors present and multiple protective factors. The injury is unexplained but may have resulted from an unwitnessed accident possibly involving sibling B.
Court Disposition
Local Authority's allegations not proved; no findings of non-accidental injury or failure to disclose accidental injury against either parent.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment