Isle & Anor, R. v

Isle & Anor, R. v

The Court held that the multiple features of greater harm and higher culpability, combined with aggravating factors and previous convictions, justified sentences outside the guideline range. The sentences imposed were not manifestly excessive.

Parties
Prosecution: Regina; Appellant: Sven Erik Isle; Appellant: Lee James Harrison
Jurisdiction
England and Wales
Judgment Date
24 March 2020
Procedural Posture
Criminal Appeal / Judgment
Outcome
appeal dismissed
Legal Topics
Sentencing, Burglary, Assault on Emergency Worker, Handling Stolen Goods, Sentencing Guidelines, Aggravating and Mitigating Factors
Criminal Law Sentencing Burglary Assault on Emergency Worker Handling Stolen Goods Sentencing Guidelines Aggravating and Mitigating Factors

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 2 Authorities cited 1 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 5
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Regina

Prosecution

Sven Erik Isle

Appellant

Lee James Harrison

Appellant

Procedural Posture

Criminal Appeal / Judgment

Legal Issues

  1. 1 Whether the sentences imposed for burglary and related offences were manifestly excessive and outside the sentencing guidelines

Ratio Decidendi

The Court held that the multiple features of greater harm and higher culpability, combined with aggravating factors and previous convictions, justified sentences outside the guideline range. The sentences imposed were not manifestly excessive.

Court Disposition

appeal dismissed

Orders

  • Appeals against sentence dismissed.