SW v IB (Challenge to Arbitral Award: Triage Determination)

SW v IB (Challenge to Arbitral Award: Triage Determination)

The mother's challenge to the arbitral determination did not have real prospects of success. The arbitrator's decision was thorough, principled, and within the band of reasonable decisions. The grounds raised by the mother were a repetition of arguments already considered and resolved. The application to adduce new evidence was refused as it did not meet the Ladd v Marshall test and would undermine the review process. The father's costs of the triage process were allowed, subject to summary assessment and reduction for proportionality.

Parties
Applicant: SW; Respondent: IB
Jurisdiction
England and Wales
Judgment Date
01 March 2023
Procedural Posture
Family Law Child Arrangements / Challenge to Arbitral Award Triage Determination and Costs
Outcome
Mother's challenge dismissed; arbitral determination endorsed; costs awarded to father.
Legal Topics
Child Arrangements, Arbitral Award Challenge, Costs Assessment
Family Law Arbitration Child Arrangements Arbitral Award Challenge Costs Assessment

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 3 Authorities cited 8 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 1
Sign in to unlock

Parties

SW

Applicant

IB

Respondent

Procedural Posture

Family Law Child Arrangements / Challenge to Arbitral Award Triage Determination and Costs

Legal Issues

  1. 1 Whether the arbitral determination on child arrangements should be upheld or set aside
  2. 2 Whether the mother should be permitted to adduce new evidence post-determination
  3. 3 Whether the respondent is entitled to costs following a failed challenge at triage stage

Ratio Decidendi

The mother's challenge to the arbitral determination did not have real prospects of success. The arbitrator's decision was thorough, principled, and within the band of reasonable decisions. The grounds raised by the mother were a repetition of arguments already considered and resolved. The application to adduce new evidence was refused as it did not meet the Ladd v Marshall test and would undermine the review process. The father's costs of the triage process were allowed, subject to summary assessment and reduction for proportionality.

Court Disposition

Mother's challenge dismissed; arbitral determination endorsed; costs awarded to father.

Orders

  • The arbitral determination is endorsed and brought into effect.
  • Mother to pay father's costs of the triage process, summarily assessed at £10,000 inclusive of VAT.