Higgins v Swanlea Ltd
The appeal was allowed because the Chief Registrar erred in concluding that CPR 3.4 was not open to the Defendants. The only evidence the claimant could adduce was insufficient to prove the pleaded agreement, and the claim was struck out as it had no reasonable prospect of success given the procedural and evidential constraints.
- Parties
- Claimant: Brian Higgins; Defendant: Swanlea Limited; Defendant: David John Cooper; Defendant: Susan Jane Cooper
- Jurisdiction
- England and Wales
- Judgment Date
- 23 May 2016
- Procedural Posture
- Civil Appeal / Appeal From Refusal to Strike Out Claim
- Outcome
- Appeal allowed; claim struck out
- Legal Topics
- Strike Out Applications, Summary Judgment, Share Allotment, Relief From Sanctions
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Brian Higgins
Claimant
Swanlea Limited
Defendant
David John Cooper
Defendant
Susan Jane Cooper
Defendant
Procedural Posture
Civil Appeal / Appeal From Refusal to Strike Out Claim
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether CPR 3.4 permits strike out based on evidence
- 2 Whether the claim discloses reasonable grounds for bringing the action
- 3 Whether the claimant can prove the pleaded agreement with admissible evidence
Ratio Decidendi
The appeal was allowed because the Chief Registrar erred in concluding that CPR 3.4 was not open to the Defendants. The only evidence the claimant could adduce was insufficient to prove the pleaded agreement, and the claim was struck out as it had no reasonable prospect of success given the procedural and evidential constraints.
Court Disposition
Appeal allowed; claim struck out
Orders
- The claim is struck out pursuant to CPR 3.4(2)(b).
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment