Swift Advances Plc v Ahmed & Anor
Swift established on the balance of probabilities that a substantial purpose of the 2006 Deed was to place assets beyond the reach of creditors or otherwise prejudice their interests; the 2006 Deed is set aside and the assets revest in Mr Ahmed.
Source-derived case information.
- Parties
- Applicant: Swift Advances Plc; Respondent: Mr Anjum Ahmed; Respondent: Mrs Parveen Ahmed
- Jurisdiction
- England and Wales
- Judgment Date
- 17 November 2015
- Procedural Posture
- Civil / Judgment After Trial of Application Under Section 423 Insolvency Act 1986
- Outcome
- Application granted; 2006 Deed set aside
- Legal Topics
- Transactions at Undervalue, Setting Aside Deeds, Purpose of Transactions, Beneficial Ownership, Land Registration
Source-derived case record
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Swift Advances Plc
Applicant
Mr Anjum Ahmed
Respondent
Mrs Parveen Ahmed
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Civil / Judgment After Trial of Application Under Section 423 Insolvency Act 1986
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the 2006 Deed and 1996 Deed were transactions at an undervalue under section 423 of the Insolvency Act 1986
- 2 Whether a substantial purpose of the deeds was to put assets beyond the reach of creditors or prejudice their interests
- 3 Whether the 2006 Deed should be set aside
Ratio Decidendi
Swift established on the balance of probabilities that a substantial purpose of the 2006 Deed was to place assets beyond the reach of creditors or otherwise prejudice their interests; the 2006 Deed is set aside and the assets revest in Mr Ahmed.
Court Disposition
Application granted; 2006 Deed set aside
Orders
- The 2006 Deed is set aside under section 423 Insolvency Act 1986.
- High Elm and Hilltop (and additional shares) revest in Mr Ahmed.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment