Robinson-Pierre v R
Section 3(1) of the Dangerous Dogs Act 1991 creates a strict liability offence but requires proof of an act or omission by the defendant that contributed to the dog being dangerously out of control in a public place. The trial judge erred in directing the jury that the owner's conduct was irrelevant, and the...
Source-derived case information.
- Parties
- Appellant: Symieon Robinson-Pierre; Respondent: Regina
- Jurisdiction
- England and Wales
- Judgment Date
- 20 December 2013
- Procedural Posture
- Criminal Appeal / Appeal Against Conviction
- Outcome
- appeal allowed; conviction quashed
- Legal Topics
- Strict Liability, Dangerous Dogs, Causation, Public Safety, Statutory Interpretation
Source-derived case record
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Symieon Robinson-Pierre
Appellant
Regina
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Criminal Appeal / Appeal Against Conviction
Legal Issues
- 1 Does section 3(1) of the Dangerous Dogs Act 1991 require proof of an act or omission by the owner causing the dog to be dangerously out of control in a public place?
- 2 Is liability under section 3(1) absolute or does it require some causal connection between the defendant's conduct and the prohibited state of affairs?
Ratio Decidendi
Section 3(1) of the Dangerous Dogs Act 1991 creates a strict liability offence but requires proof of an act or omission by the defendant that contributed to the dog being dangerously out of control in a public place. The trial judge erred in directing the jury that the owner's conduct was irrelevant, and the conviction is therefore unsafe.
Court Disposition
appeal allowed; conviction quashed
Orders
- Conviction quashed
- No order as to sentence as sentence already served
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment