Syncreon Group BV, Re

Syncreon Group BV, Re

The court sanctioned the schemes because all statutory requirements were met, creditor classes were properly constituted and fairly represented, the schemes were fair and reasonable, there was no blot, the court had jurisdiction, and the schemes were likely to be effective in relevant jurisdictions.

Parties
Applicant: Syncreon Group BV; Applicant: Syncreon Automotive (UK) Ltd; Respondent: Ad Hoc Group
Jurisdiction
England and Wales
Judgment Date
10 September 2019
Procedural Posture
Companies Act Scheme of Arrangement / Sanction Hearing
Outcome
Schemes of arrangement sanctioned
Legal Topics
Schemes of Arrangement, Debt Restructuring, Jurisdiction, Creditor Meetings, Sanction of Schemes

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 3 Authorities cited 9 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 5
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Syncreon Group BV

Applicant

Syncreon Automotive (UK) Ltd

Applicant

Ad Hoc Group

Respondent

Procedural Posture

Companies Act Scheme of Arrangement / Sanction Hearing

  1. 1 Whether the statutory requirements for sanctioning a scheme of arrangement under section 899 of the Companies Act 2006 are met
  2. 2 Whether the classes of creditors were properly constituted and fairly represented
  3. 3 Whether the scheme is fair and reasonable

Ratio Decidendi

The court sanctioned the schemes because all statutory requirements were met, creditor classes were properly constituted and fairly represented, the schemes were fair and reasonable, there was no blot, the court had jurisdiction, and the schemes were likely to be effective in relevant jurisdictions.

Court Disposition

Schemes of arrangement sanctioned

Orders

  • Order sanctioning the schemes of arrangement for Syncreon Group BV and Syncreon Automotive (UK) Ltd