Boston Trust Company Ltd & Anor (Trustees of Erutuf Trust) v Szerelmey Ltd & Ors
Where minority shareholders have been given permission to bring a derivative action on behalf of companies, and the claims are properly and reasonably brought for the benefit of the companies, the court should in principle grant a pre-emptive indemnity for costs, regardless of the claimants' means. The facts do not resemble a partnership dispute, and the claims have sufficient merit. The indemnity should be limited to a particular stage (exchange of witness statements), with review at the pre-trial review stage. The application for an order for costs incurred to date is adjourned pending the outcome of an appeal.
- Parties
- Claimant: Boston Trust Company Limited; Claimant: Boston Fiduciary Management Limited; Defendant: Szerelmey Limited; Defendant: Szerelmey (GB) Limited; Defendant: Szerelmey Restoration Limited; Defendant: Tellisford Limited; Defendant: Gordon Verhoef; Defendant: Szerelmey (UK) Limited; Defendant: London Stone Limited; Defendant: Heritage House (York) Limited; Defendant: Tusk Holdings Limited; Defendant: Hare and Ransome Joinery Ltd
- Jurisdiction
- England and Wales
- Judgment Date
- 13 November 2020
- Procedural Posture
- Derivative Action (multiple Derivative Claim, Common Law) / Application for Pre Emptive Indemnity for Costs and Costs of Earlier Proceedings
- Outcome
- Application for pre-emptive indemnity granted; application for order for costs incurred to date adjourned.
- Legal Topics
- Derivative Actions, Minority Shareholder Rights, Costs Indemnity, Standing of Claimants, Rectification of Register, Pre Emptive Costs Orders
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Boston Trust Company Limited
Claimant
Boston Fiduciary Management Limited
Claimant
Szerelmey Limited
Defendant
Szerelmey (GB) Limited
Defendant
Szerelmey Restoration Limited
Defendant
Tellisford Limited
Defendant
Gordon Verhoef
Defendant
Szerelmey (UK) Limited
Defendant
London Stone Limited
Defendant
Heritage House (York) Limited
Defendant
Tusk Holdings Limited
Defendant
Hare and Ransome Joinery Ltd
Defendant
Procedural Posture
Derivative Action (multiple Derivative Claim, Common Law) / Application for Pre Emptive Indemnity for Costs and Costs of Earlier Proceedings
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the claimants are entitled to a pre-emptive indemnity for costs from the companies in respect of the derivative action
- 2 Whether the claimants are entitled to an indemnity for adverse costs orders
- 3 Whether the costs incurred to date should be paid by the companies
Ratio Decidendi
Where minority shareholders have been given permission to bring a derivative action on behalf of companies, and the claims are properly and reasonably brought for the benefit of the companies, the court should in principle grant a pre-emptive indemnity for costs, regardless of the claimants' means. The facts do not resemble a partnership dispute, and the claims have sufficient merit. The indemnity should be limited to a particular stage (exchange of witness statements), with review at the pre-trial review stage. The application for an order for costs incurred to date is adjourned pending the outcome of an appeal.
Court Disposition
Application for pre-emptive indemnity granted; application for order for costs incurred to date adjourned.
Orders
- Claimants granted a pre-emptive indemnity for their costs (including adverse costs) down to exchange of witness statements, with review at pre-trial review stage.
- Indemnity includes costs already incurred by the claimants, subject to terms to be agreed.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment