V v T & Anor [2014] EWHC 3432 (Ch) (23 October 2014)

V v T & Anor [2014] EWHC 3432 (Ch) (23 October 2014)

The evidence did not justify a private hearing under the open justice principle, but reporting restrictions and anonymisation were appropriate to protect the welfare of minor beneficiaries from adverse effects of publicity about their wealth.

Citation
[2014] EWHC 3432 (Ch)
Parties
Claimant: V; Defendant: T; Defendant: A; Defendant: Minor Beneficiaries
Jurisdiction
England and Wales
Judgment Date
23 October 2014
Procedural Posture
Variation of Trusts Act 1958 Application / Judgment on Application for Private Hearing and Reporting Restrictions
Outcome
Application for private hearing refused; reporting restrictions and anonymisation granted.
Legal Topics
Variation of Trusts, Open Justice, Reporting Restrictions, Anonymity Orders, Children's Welfare
Trusts Civil Procedure Human Rights Variation of Trusts Open Justice Reporting Restrictions Anonymity Orders Children's Welfare

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 3 Authorities cited 21 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 1
Sign in to unlock

Parties

V

Claimant

T

Defendant

A

Defendant

Minor Beneficiaries

Defendant

Procedural Posture

Variation of Trusts Act 1958 Application / Judgment on Application for Private Hearing and Reporting Restrictions

Legal Issues

  1. 1 Whether the hearing of applications under the Variation of Trusts Act 1958 should be in private or in open court
  2. 2 Whether reporting restrictions and anonymisation should be imposed to protect minor beneficiaries
  3. 3 Whether the evidence justified derogation from the open justice principle

Ratio Decidendi

The evidence did not justify a private hearing under the open justice principle, but reporting restrictions and anonymisation were appropriate to protect the welfare of minor beneficiaries from adverse effects of publicity about their wealth.

Court Disposition

Application for private hearing refused; reporting restrictions and anonymisation granted.

Orders

  • Hearing to proceed in open court.
  • Reporting restrictions imposed to protect the identity and welfare of minor beneficiaries.