Taxo A1 Inc v Tahir [2025] EWHC 1986 (KB) (05 June 2025)

Taxo A1 Inc v Tahir [2025] EWHC 1986 (KB) (05 June 2025)

There are no special factors justifying a departure from the usual order; as the merits have not been determined and the case is at an early stage, costs of the interim application are reserved.

Citation
[2025] EWHC 1986 (KB)
Parties
Claimant: Taxo AI Inc; Defendant: Tahir
Jurisdiction
England and Wales
Judgment Date
05 June 2025
Procedural Posture
Interim Injunction Application in Breach of Contract Claim / Post Interim Injunction, Costs Determination
Outcome
Costs reserved; no immediate order for costs in favour of either party.
Legal Topics
Interim Injunctions, Costs Orders, Breach of Contract, Adequacy of Damages
Civil Procedure Contract Law Interim Injunctions Costs Orders Breach of Contract Adequacy of Damages

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 3 Authorities cited 4 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 1
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Taxo AI Inc

Claimant

Tahir

Defendant

Procedural Posture

Interim Injunction Application in Breach of Contract Claim / Post Interim Injunction, Costs Determination

Legal Issues

  1. 1 Whether interim injunction should be granted in breach of contract context
  2. 2 Whether costs of interim application should be awarded or reserved

Ratio Decidendi

There are no special factors justifying a departure from the usual order; as the merits have not been determined and the case is at an early stage, costs of the interim application are reserved.

Court Disposition

Costs reserved; no immediate order for costs in favour of either party.

Orders

  • Costs of the interim application are reserved.