Tahirah Pirmohamed v Information Commissioner

Tahirah Pirmohamed v Information Commissioner

The Tribunal struck out the application because the applicant had already received all procedural remedies available under section 166 DPA18, and the Tribunal had no jurisdiction to consider the merits of the complaint or grant the substantive remedies sought.

Parties
Applicant: Tahirah Pirmohamed; Respondent: Information Commissioner
Jurisdiction
England and Wales
Judgment Date
30 September 2022
Procedural Posture
Appeal / Application to Strike Out Appeal at First Tier Tribunal (general Regulatory Chamber)
Outcome
Application struck out
Legal Topics
Section 166 Data Protection Act 2018, Tribunal Jurisdiction, GDPR Complaints, Procedural Remedies
Data Protection Information Rights Section 166 Data Protection Act 2018 Tribunal Jurisdiction GDPR Complaints Procedural Remedies

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 3 Authorities cited 7 Party arguments 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Tahirah Pirmohamed

Applicant

Information Commissioner

Respondent

Procedural Posture

Appeal / Application to Strike Out Appeal at First Tier Tribunal (general Regulatory Chamber)

Legal Issues

  1. 1 Whether the Tribunal has jurisdiction to grant the remedies sought under section 166 DPA 2018
  2. 2 Whether the application has any reasonable prospect of success

Ratio Decidendi

The Tribunal struck out the application because the applicant had already received all procedural remedies available under section 166 DPA18, and the Tribunal had no jurisdiction to consider the merits of the complaint or grant the substantive remedies sought.

Court Disposition

Application struck out

Orders

  • The application is struck out pursuant to rule 8(3)(c) of the Tribunal Procedure (First-tier Tribunal) (General Regulatory Chamber) Rules 2009.