R v Talliq Mwalim

R v Talliq Mwalim

The sentence of 23 years' imprisonment was within the guideline range, properly reflected the seriousness of the offence, the appellant's age, and available mitigation. The lack of a pre-sentence report was not improper given the judge's familiarity with the case. The disparity with the co-accused's sentence was justified by differences in age, criminal record, and remorse.

Parties
Prosecutor: Rex; Appellant: Talliq Mwalim
Jurisdiction
England and Wales
Judgment Date
09 November 2022
Procedural Posture
Criminal Appeal / Appeal Against Sentence
Outcome
Appeal dismissed
Legal Topics
Attempted Murder, Sentencing, Grievous Bodily Harm, Possession of Offensive Weapon, Appeal Procedure
Criminal Law Attempted Murder Sentencing Grievous Bodily Harm Possession of Offensive Weapon Appeal Procedure

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 3 Authorities cited 1 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Rex

Prosecutor

Talliq Mwalim

Appellant

Procedural Posture

Criminal Appeal / Appeal Against Sentence

Legal Issues

  1. 1 Whether the sentence imposed was manifestly excessive
  2. 2 Whether sufficient weight was given to the appellant's age
  3. 3 Whether there was unjustified disparity between the appellant's sentence and that of a co-accused

Ratio Decidendi

The sentence of 23 years' imprisonment was within the guideline range, properly reflected the seriousness of the offence, the appellant's age, and available mitigation. The lack of a pre-sentence report was not improper given the judge's familiarity with the case. The disparity with the co-accused's sentence was justified by differences in age, criminal record, and remorse.

Court Disposition

Appeal dismissed

Orders

  • The sentence of 23 years' imprisonment for attempted murder is upheld.
  • The concurrent sentence of six months for possession of an offensive weapon is upheld.