Uddin & Anor v R.

Uddin & Anor v R.

The judge's summing up, though brief regarding Mr Uddin, did not render the conviction unsafe as the defence case was adequately put and the evidence against him was clear. The prosecution's conduct did not amount to an abuse of process; investigations and charging decisions were within proper bounds. Exclusion of certain evidence was justified and did not prejudice the defence. The convictions are safe.

Parties
Appellant: Tamij Uddin; Applicant: Kazi Borkot Ullah; Applicant: Abdul Kalam Muhammad Rezaul Karim; Respondent: The Queen
Jurisdiction
England and Wales
Judgment Date
13 January 2021
Procedural Posture
Criminal Appeal / Judgment on Appeal and Renewed Applications for Leave to Appeal
Outcome
Appeal dismissed; renewed applications refused
Legal Topics
Conspiracy to Defraud, Cheating the Public Revenue, Proceeds of Crime, Abuse of Process, Summing Up, Fair Trial, Evidence Admissibility
Criminal Law Conspiracy to Defraud Cheating the Public Revenue Proceeds of Crime Abuse of Process Summing Up Fair Trial Evidence Admissibility

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 4 Authorities cited 1 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 3
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Tamij Uddin

Appellant

Kazi Borkot Ullah

Applicant

Abdul Kalam Muhammad Rezaul Karim

Applicant

The Queen

Respondent

Procedural Posture

Criminal Appeal / Judgment on Appeal and Renewed Applications for Leave to Appeal

Legal Issues

  1. 1 Whether the trial judge's summing up rendered the convictions unsafe
  2. 2 Whether the prosecution's conduct amounted to an abuse of process
  3. 3 Whether exclusion of certain evidence was proper

Ratio Decidendi

The judge's summing up, though brief regarding Mr Uddin, did not render the conviction unsafe as the defence case was adequately put and the evidence against him was clear. The prosecution's conduct did not amount to an abuse of process; investigations and charging decisions were within proper bounds. Exclusion of certain evidence was justified and did not prejudice the defence. The convictions are safe.

Court Disposition

Appeal dismissed; renewed applications refused

Orders

  • Mr Uddin's appeal against conviction is dismissed.
  • Mr Ullah's renewed application for leave to appeal is dismissed.