Nguyen, R. v [2025] EWHC 633 (SCCO) (17 March 2025)
A greater proportion of the electronic datum from the mobile phone should be included in the PPE count, as the prosecution relied on the holistic use of the phone to rebut the modern slavery defence. However, not all electronic data is appropriate for inclusion. Given the lack of detailed breakdown and the 10,000 page cap, the judge directs that 10,000 pages of electronic datum be included, making a total PPE count of 10,131. The appeal is allowed to this extent.
- Citation
- [2025] EWHC 633 (SCCO)
- Parties
- Prosecution: REX; Defendant: Tan Cong Nguyen
- Jurisdiction
- England and Wales
- Judgment Date
- 17 March 2025
- Procedural Posture
- Costs Appeal (criminal Legal Aid) / Appeal From Determining Officer's Decision
- Outcome
- Appeal allowed
- Legal Topics
- Litigator's Graduated Fees Scheme, Pages of Prosecution Evidence (ppe), Electronic Evidence, Modern Slavery Defence
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
REX
Prosecution
Tan Cong Nguyen
Defendant
Procedural Posture
Costs Appeal (criminal Legal Aid) / Appeal From Determining Officer's Decision
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the total PPE count should be 10,000 as claimed or 882 as allowed
- 2 What categories of electronic evidence should be included in PPE under the 2013 Regulations
Ratio Decidendi
A greater proportion of the electronic datum from the mobile phone should be included in the PPE count, as the prosecution relied on the holistic use of the phone to rebut the modern slavery defence. However, not all electronic data is appropriate for inclusion. Given the lack of detailed breakdown and the 10,000 page cap, the judge directs that 10,000 pages of electronic datum be included, making a total PPE count of 10,131. The appeal is allowed to this extent.
Court Disposition
Appeal allowed
Orders
- The PPE count is set at 10,131 pages for LGFS purposes.
- The Appellants are awarded £750 plus any VAT payable in costs, in addition to the £100 paid on appeal.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment