Grand v Gill
Plasterwork on internal walls and ceilings forms part of the structure of the premises for which the landlord is responsible under repairing covenants. The judge erred in discounting damages for damp and mould by 90% as Mr Gill was fully liable for the plasterwork disrepair. Damages should be increased accordingly, and interest should be awarded from 1 December 2007 at 2%.
- Parties
- Appellant: Tanya Grand; Respondent: Param Gill
- Jurisdiction
- England and Wales
- Judgment Date
- 19 May 2011
- Procedural Posture
- Civil Appeal / Appeal From Central London County Court to Court of Appeal
- Outcome
- Appeal allowed in part
- Legal Topics
- Repairing Obligations, Damages Assessment, Interest on Damages, Costs, Structure of Premises
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Tanya Grand
Appellant
Param Gill
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Civil Appeal / Appeal From Central London County Court to Court of Appeal
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether internal plasterwork forms part of the 'structure' for which the landlord is responsible under repairing covenants
- 2 Whether the judge erred in discounting damages for damp and mould by 90%
- 3 Whether interest should have been awarded on damages
Ratio Decidendi
Plasterwork on internal walls and ceilings forms part of the structure of the premises for which the landlord is responsible under repairing covenants. The judge erred in discounting damages for damp and mould by 90% as Mr Gill was fully liable for the plasterwork disrepair. Damages should be increased accordingly, and interest should be awarded from 1 December 2007 at 2%.
Court Disposition
Appeal allowed in part
Orders
- Damages increased from £5,600 to £6,275 in favour of Ms Grand
- Interest at 2% awarded on damages from 1 December 2007 to 7 May 2009
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment