Target Group Limited v The Commissioners for HMRC
The services supplied by Target to Shawbrook Bank are not exempt transactions concerning payments or transfers under Article 135(1)(d) of the Principal VAT Directive, as Target does not itself effect the legal and financial changes characteristic of the transfer of money; the loan accounts operated are not current accounts for VAT purposes; the services are standard rated for VAT purposes.
- Parties
- Appellant: Target Group Limited; Respondents: The Commissioners for Her Majesty’s Revenue and Customs
- Jurisdiction
- England and Wales
- Judgment Date
- 15 November 2019
- Procedural Posture
- VAT Appeal / Upper Tribunal (tax and Chancery Chamber) Appeal From First Tier Tribunal
- Outcome
- Appeal dismissed
- Legal Topics
- VAT Exemption, Loan Administration Services, Debt Collection, Transactions Concerning Payments or Transfers, Current Accounts, Composite Supply Classification
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Target Group Limited
Appellant
The Commissioners for Her Majesty’s Revenue and Customs
Respondents
Procedural Posture
VAT Appeal / Upper Tribunal (tax and Chancery Chamber) Appeal From First Tier Tribunal
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether loan administration services supplied by Target to Shawbrook Bank are exempt from VAT under Article 135(1)(d) of the Principal VAT Directive
- 2 Whether loan accounts operated by Target are current accounts for VAT purposes
- 3 Whether Target's services constitute transactions concerning payments or transfers
Ratio Decidendi
The services supplied by Target to Shawbrook Bank are not exempt transactions concerning payments or transfers under Article 135(1)(d) of the Principal VAT Directive, as Target does not itself effect the legal and financial changes characteristic of the transfer of money; the loan accounts operated are not current accounts for VAT purposes; the services are standard rated for VAT purposes.
Court Disposition
Appeal dismissed
Orders
- Any application for costs must be made in writing within one month after the date of release of this decision as required by rule 10(5)(a) and (6) of the Tribunal Procedure (Upper Tribunal) Rules 2008.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment