Wet Finishing Works Ltd, R (On the Application Of) v Taunton Deane Borough Council
The Defendant breached its duty of procedural fairness by failing to consult the Claimant before entering into the new section 106 agreement, materially affecting the Claimant's legal position; this breach warrants quashing the planning permission.
- Parties
- Claimant: Wet Finishing Works Limited; Defendant: Taunton Deane Borough Council; Interested Party: Strongvox Homes
- Jurisdiction
- England and Wales
- Judgment Date
- 20 July 2017
- Procedural Posture
- Judicial Review / Final Judgment
- Outcome
- Claim for judicial review succeeds on procedural fairness only; planning permission quashed.
- Legal Topics
- Procedural Fairness, Ultra Vires, Section 106 Agreements, Consultation Duties
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Wet Finishing Works Limited
Claimant
Taunton Deane Borough Council
Defendant
Strongvox Homes
Interested Party
Procedural Posture
Judicial Review / Final Judgment
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the Defendant was required to consult the Claimant before entering into a new section 106 agreement in 2016
- 2 Whether the Defendant's decision was ultra vires section 73 of the Town and Country Planning Act 1990
Ratio Decidendi
The Defendant breached its duty of procedural fairness by failing to consult the Claimant before entering into the new section 106 agreement, materially affecting the Claimant's legal position; this breach warrants quashing the planning permission.
Court Disposition
Claim for judicial review succeeds on procedural fairness only; planning permission quashed.
Orders
- Planning permission granted to the Interested Party under section 73 of the Town and Country Planning Act 1990 is quashed.
- Application for permission to amend grounds to rely on statutory consultation duty is refused.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment