Imerman v Tchenguiz
Permission to appeal is granted because it is properly arguable that the balancing exercise between privacy and fair trial rights required a full trial rather than summary judgment, especially given the lack of analysis on the relevance of the remaining material and the developing legal tension between admissibility and tortious liability.
- Parties
- Claimant: Imerman; Defendant: Tchenguiz
- Jurisdiction
- England and Wales
- Judgment Date
- 27 January 2010
- Procedural Posture
- Civil Appeal / Renewed Application for Permission to Appeal
- Outcome
- permission to appeal granted
- Legal Topics
- Breach of Confidence, Right to Privacy, Admissibility of Evidence, Summary Judgment, Public Interest Defence
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Imerman
Claimant
Tchenguiz
Defendant
Procedural Posture
Civil Appeal / Renewed Application for Permission to Appeal
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether summary judgment restraining disclosure of confidential information was appropriate in the context of ongoing divorce proceedings
- 2 Whether the balancing exercise under Article 8(2) ECHR between privacy rights and the right to a fair trial required a full trial rather than summary judgment
- 3 Whether material irregularly obtained but relevant to divorce proceedings should be admissible
Ratio Decidendi
Permission to appeal is granted because it is properly arguable that the balancing exercise between privacy and fair trial rights required a full trial rather than summary judgment, especially given the lack of analysis on the relevance of the remaining material and the developing legal tension between admissibility and tortious liability.
Court Disposition
permission to appeal granted
Orders
- Application for permission to appeal is granted.
- Appeal to be heard together with related proceedings before a constitution including a judge with family law experience.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment