AVB v TDD [2013] EWHC 1705 (QB) (20 June 2013)

AVB v TDD [2013] EWHC 1705 (QB) (20 June 2013)

Interim non-disclosure injunctions restricting Article 10 rights must be subject to active case management, directions, and time limits; orders without such provisions will not be granted.

Citation
[2013] EWHC 1705 (QB)
Parties
Claimant: AVB; Defendant: TDD
Jurisdiction
England and Wales
Judgment Date
20 June 2013
Procedural Posture
Interim Non Disclosure Injunction / Return Date Hearing; Order Made With Undertakings and Directions
Outcome
Order made with undertakings, directions for progress, and expiry date for undertakings.
Legal Topics
Interim Injunctions, Non Disclosure Orders, Case Management, Open Justice
Privacy Civil Procedure Interim Injunctions Non Disclosure Orders Case Management Open Justice

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 3 Authorities cited 4 Party arguments 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

AVB

Claimant

TDD

Defendant

Procedural Posture

Interim Non Disclosure Injunction / Return Date Hearing; Order Made With Undertakings and Directions

Legal Issues

  1. 1 Whether interim non-disclosure injunction should continue
  2. 2 Whether undertakings should be time-limited and subject to directions
  3. 3 Whether derogations from open justice are justified

Ratio Decidendi

Interim non-disclosure injunctions restricting Article 10 rights must be subject to active case management, directions, and time limits; orders without such provisions will not be granted.

Court Disposition

Order made with undertakings, directions for progress, and expiry date for undertakings.

Orders

  • Both parties to give undertakings to the court.
  • Directions for progress of the action included.