AVB v TDD [2013] EWHC 1705 (QB) (20 June 2013)

AVB v TDD [2013] EWHC 1705 (QB) (20 June 2013)

Interim non-disclosure injunctions restricting Article 10 rights must be subject to active case management, directions, and time limits; court declined to make order without such provisions and required undertakings to expire unless renewed or discharged.

Citation
[2013] EWHC 1705
Parties
Claimant: AVB; Defendant: TDD
Jurisdiction
England and Wales
Judgment Date
20 June 2013
Procedural Posture
Injunction Application (non Disclosure) / Interim Order With Directions for Case Management
Outcome
Order made with directions and time-limited undertakings; parties required to agree terms and submit draft order.
Legal Topics
Non Disclosure Injunctions, Anonymity Orders, Case Management, Open Justice

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 3 Authorities cited 4 Party arguments 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

AVB

Claimant

TDD

Defendant

Procedural Posture

Injunction Application (non Disclosure) / Interim Order With Directions for Case Management

  1. 1 Whether interim non-disclosure injunction should be continued
  2. 2 Whether derogations from open justice are justified
  3. 3 Whether undertakings should be time-limited and subject to directions

Ratio Decidendi

Interim non-disclosure injunctions restricting Article 10 rights must be subject to active case management, directions, and time limits; court declined to make order without such provisions and required undertakings to expire unless renewed or discharged.

Court Disposition

Order made with directions and time-limited undertakings; parties required to agree terms and submit draft order.

Orders

  • Interim non-disclosure injunction continued with directions for progress of action.
  • Undertakings by both parties to court.