AVB v TDD [2013] EWHC 1705 (QB) (20 June 2013)
Interim non-disclosure injunctions restricting Article 10 rights must be subject to active case management, directions, and time limits; court declined to make order without such provisions and required undertakings to expire unless renewed or discharged.
- Citation
- [2013] EWHC 1705
- Parties
- Claimant: AVB; Defendant: TDD
- Jurisdiction
- England and Wales
- Judgment Date
- 20 June 2013
- Procedural Posture
- Injunction Application (non Disclosure) / Interim Order With Directions for Case Management
- Outcome
- Order made with directions and time-limited undertakings; parties required to agree terms and submit draft order.
- Legal Topics
- Non Disclosure Injunctions, Anonymity Orders, Case Management, Open Justice
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
AVB
Claimant
TDD
Defendant
Procedural Posture
Injunction Application (non Disclosure) / Interim Order With Directions for Case Management
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether interim non-disclosure injunction should be continued
- 2 Whether derogations from open justice are justified
- 3 Whether undertakings should be time-limited and subject to directions
Ratio Decidendi
Interim non-disclosure injunctions restricting Article 10 rights must be subject to active case management, directions, and time limits; court declined to make order without such provisions and required undertakings to expire unless renewed or discharged.
Court Disposition
Order made with directions and time-limited undertakings; parties required to agree terms and submit draft order.
Orders
- Interim non-disclosure injunction continued with directions for progress of action.
- Undertakings by both parties to court.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment