AMV v TDX

AMV v TDX

The claimant demonstrated a reasonable expectation of privacy in the confidential information, there was no public interest in its disclosure, and the balance of convenience favoured granting interim relief to prevent disproportionate harm pending a return date.

Parties
Claimant: AMV; Defendant: TDX
Jurisdiction
England and Wales
Judgment Date
09 January 2025
Procedural Posture
Civil / Interim Injunction Application (without Notice)
Outcome
Interim injunction granted
Legal Topics
Interim Injunctions, Anonymity Orders, Private Hearings, Section 12 Human Rights Act 1998
Privacy Confidentiality Human Rights Interim Injunctions Anonymity Orders Private Hearings Section 12 Human Rights Act 1998

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 2 Authorities cited 1 Party arguments 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

AMV

Claimant

TDX

Defendant

Procedural Posture

Civil / Interim Injunction Application (without Notice)

Legal Issues

  1. 1 Whether an interim injunction restraining publication of confidential information should be granted without notice
  2. 2 Whether the hearing should be held in private and the claimant anonymised
  3. 3 Whether the balance of convenience favours granting interim relief

Ratio Decidendi

The claimant demonstrated a reasonable expectation of privacy in the confidential information, there was no public interest in its disclosure, and the balance of convenience favoured granting interim relief to prevent disproportionate harm pending a return date.

Court Disposition

Interim injunction granted

Orders

  • Defendant restrained from publishing specified confidential information
  • Hearing held in private