Technotrade Ltd v Larkstore Ltd
Larkstore, as assignee, is entitled to recover substantial damages for loss suffered after the transfer of the site but before the assignment, provided the loss flows from the original breach of contract by Technotrade. The assignment was valid and not champertous. The principle that an assignee cannot recover more than the assignor does not prevent recovery in these circumstances, as the loss would have been recoverable by the assignor had it retained the property. The assignment does not create a 'legal black hole' and does not prejudice the contract-breaker beyond what would have been the case absent the assignment.
- Parties
- Appellant: Technotrade Ltd; Respondent: Larkstore Ltd
- Jurisdiction
- England and Wales
- Judgment Date
- 27 July 2006
- Procedural Posture
- Civil Appeal / Appeal From High Court (preliminary Issue Determination)
- Outcome
- Appeal dismissed
- Legal Topics
- Assignment of Causes of Action, Measure of Damages, Duty of Care, Privity of Contract, Remoteness of Damage
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Technotrade Ltd
Appellant
Larkstore Ltd
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Civil Appeal / Appeal From High Court (preliminary Issue Determination)
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether an assignee of a cause of action for breach of contract can recover substantial damages for loss suffered after the transfer of property but before the assignment, in excess of what the assignor could have recovered.
- 2 Whether the assignment of the cause of action was valid and not champertous.
- 3 Whether Technotrade owed a duty of care in tort to Larkstore and/or third parties.
Ratio Decidendi
Larkstore, as assignee, is entitled to recover substantial damages for loss suffered after the transfer of the site but before the assignment, provided the loss flows from the original breach of contract by Technotrade. The assignment was valid and not champertous. The principle that an assignee cannot recover more than the assignor does not prevent recovery in these circumstances, as the loss would have been recoverable by the assignor had it retained the property. The assignment does not create a 'legal black hole' and does not prejudice the contract-breaker beyond what would have been the case absent the assignment.
Court Disposition
Appeal dismissed
Orders
- Appeal on the assignment point dismissed.
- Applications for permission to appeal on the duty of care point refused with no order as to costs.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment