Marlton v Tectronix UK Holdings

Marlton v Tectronix UK Holdings

Given the centrality of the date of receipt of the emails to the dispute, all documents tending to show the date of receipt or non-receipt are potentially disclosable. The claimant's disclosure has been inadequate, and inspection of relevant materials in the claimant's possession, custody, or control, specifically relating to the Belgian email address, is appropriate. Any inspection must be by an independent expert to protect privileged material.

Parties
Claimant: Antony Marlton; Defendant: Tectronix UK Holdings
Jurisdiction
England and Wales
Judgment Date
10 February 2003
Procedural Posture
Civil / Interlocutory Application for Disclosure
Outcome
Application for further disclosure and inspection granted in part, subject to safeguards.
Legal Topics
Disclosure of Electronic Documents, Interpretation of Contract Clauses, Inspection of Computer Records

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 2 Authorities cited 2 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 1
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Antony Marlton

Claimant

Tectronix UK Holdings

Defendant

Procedural Posture

Civil / Interlocutory Application for Disclosure

  1. 1 Whether the claimant must disclose electronic records to establish the date of receipt of completion accounts via email
  2. 2 Whether inspection of the claimant's computer hard disks and related backups is appropriate
  3. 3 Whether such inspection should be conducted by an independent expert

Ratio Decidendi

Given the centrality of the date of receipt of the emails to the dispute, all documents tending to show the date of receipt or non-receipt are potentially disclosable. The claimant's disclosure has been inadequate, and inspection of relevant materials in the claimant's possession, custody, or control, specifically relating to the Belgian email address, is appropriate. Any inspection must be by an independent expert to protect privileged material.

Court Disposition

Application for further disclosure and inspection granted in part, subject to safeguards.

Orders

  • Disclosure of relevant materials in the claimant's possession, custody, or control relating to the Belgian email address is ordered.
  • Inspection to be conducted by an independent expert, not associated with the defendants.