Fulham Broadway Trustees v Telefonica UK
The application was dismissed because the arbitrator gave the landlord a reasonable opportunity to address the evidential value of the Unit 8 letting, dealt with all relevant issues, and no serious irregularity or substantial injustice was established under section 68 of the Arbitration Act 1996.
- Parties
- Claimant: Fulham Broadway Trustees; Defendant: Telefonica UK
- Jurisdiction
- England and Wales
- Judgment Date
- 20 February 2014
- Procedural Posture
- Arbitration Challenge Under Arbitration Act 1996 / Judgment on Application to Set Aside/remit Arbitral Award
- Outcome
- Application dismissed
- Legal Topics
- Serious Irregularity Under Section 68 Arbitration Act 1996, General Duty of Tribunal Under Section 33 Arbitration Act 1996, Rent Review, Open Market Rent, Procedural Fairness in Arbitration
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Fulham Broadway Trustees
Claimant
Telefonica UK
Defendant
Procedural Posture
Arbitration Challenge Under Arbitration Act 1996 / Judgment on Application to Set Aside/remit Arbitral Award
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the arbitrator failed to comply with section 33 of the Arbitration Act 1996 by not giving the landlord a reasonable opportunity to address the weight to be given to the Unit 8 letting as a comparable.
- 2 Whether the arbitrator failed to deal with all issues put to him, specifically the effect of the Statement of Agreed Facts on the evidential value of the Unit 8 letting.
Ratio Decidendi
The application was dismissed because the arbitrator gave the landlord a reasonable opportunity to address the evidential value of the Unit 8 letting, dealt with all relevant issues, and no serious irregularity or substantial injustice was established under section 68 of the Arbitration Act 1996.
Court Disposition
Application dismissed
Orders
- The application to set aside or remit the arbitral award is dismissed.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment