Burleigh v Telegraph Media Group Ltd

Burleigh v Telegraph Media Group Ltd

The Apology neither alleges nor implies any culpable failure, want of skill, or care on the part of the Claimant. The corrections are trivial or insubstantial, and the Apology contains no attribution of fault or blame. The hypothetical reader would not reasonably infer culpability; therefore, the Apology is not defamatory of the Claimant at common law.

Parties
Claimant: Nina Burleigh; Defendant: Telegraph Media Group Limited
Jurisdiction
England and Wales
Judgment Date
02 September 2020
Procedural Posture
Libel Action / Determination of Preliminary Issues on Written Submissions
Outcome
Claim dismissed; Defendant provisionally entitled to judgment.
Legal Topics
Defamatory Meaning, Apology, Common Law Threshold, Professional Reputation
Defamation Media Law Defamatory Meaning Apology Common Law Threshold Professional Reputation

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 5 Authorities cited 12 Party arguments 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Nina Burleigh

Claimant

Telegraph Media Group Limited

Defendant

Procedural Posture

Libel Action / Determination of Preliminary Issues on Written Submissions

Legal Issues

  1. 1 Whether the Apology published by the Defendant was defamatory of the Claimant at common law
  2. 2 What natural and ordinary meaning the Apology bears in respect of the Claimant

Ratio Decidendi

The Apology neither alleges nor implies any culpable failure, want of skill, or care on the part of the Claimant. The corrections are trivial or insubstantial, and the Apology contains no attribution of fault or blame. The hypothetical reader would not reasonably infer culpability; therefore, the Apology is not defamatory of the Claimant at common law.

Court Disposition

Claim dismissed; Defendant provisionally entitled to judgment.