Cook v Telegraph Media Group Ltd [2011] EWHC 1519 (QB) (16 June 2011)

Cook v Telegraph Media Group Ltd [2011] EWHC 1519 (QB) (16 June 2011)

Each of the three comments was one which could have been made by an honest person on the admitted facts, and the claimant failed to prove malice as the journalists believed the comments were justified.

Citation
[2011] EWHC 1519 (QB)
Parties
Claimant: Frank Cook; Defendant: Telegraph Media Group Limited
Jurisdiction
England and Wales
Judgment Date
16 June 2011
Procedural Posture
Libel Action / Trial of Preliminary Issues
Outcome
Claim dismissed
Legal Topics
Libel, Fair Comment Defence, Malice, Mps' Expenses, Defamatory Meaning
Defamation Media Law Libel Fair Comment Defence Malice Mps' Expenses Defamatory Meaning

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 2 Authorities cited 6 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 3
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Frank Cook

Claimant

Telegraph Media Group Limited

Defendant

Procedural Posture

Libel Action / Trial of Preliminary Issues

Legal Issues

  1. 1 Whether the comments in the articles could have been made by an honest person on the basis of the admitted facts
  2. 2 Whether the defendant acted with malice in publishing the comments

Ratio Decidendi

Each of the three comments was one which could have been made by an honest person on the admitted facts, and the claimant failed to prove malice as the journalists believed the comments were justified.

Court Disposition

Claim dismissed

Orders

  • Claim dismissed in full
  • Defence of fair comment succeeds