Nursing and Midwifery Council v Mtisi [2012] EWHC 513 (Admin) (22 February 2012)

Given the gravity of the allegations and the need to protect the public, the extension of the interim suspension order is justified until after the substantive hearing.

Source-derived case information.

Citation: [2012] EWHC 513 (Admin)
Parties: Claimant: The Nursing and Midwifery Council; Defendant: Tendai Mtisi
Jurisdiction: England and Wales
Judgment Date: 22 February 2012
Procedural Posture: Application for Extension of Interim Order / Hearing of Application for Extension
Outcome: Application granted
Legal Topics: Interim Orders, Suspension of Registration, Professional Misconduct

Administrative Law Professional Regulation Interim Orders Suspension of Registration Professional Misconduct

Source-derived case record

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 1 Authorities cited 1 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 1

Parties

The Nursing and Midwifery Council

Claimant

Tendai Mtisi

Defendant

Procedural Posture

Application for Extension of Interim Order / Hearing of Application for Extension

Legal Issues

1 Whether an extension of the interim suspension order is necessary to protect the public and in the public interest

Ratio Decidendi

Given the gravity of the allegations and the need to protect the public, the extension of the interim suspension order is justified until after the substantive hearing.

Court Disposition

Application granted

Orders

Extension of interim suspension order for six months from 22 February 2012

About this LexChat collection

Publisher and coverage

LexChat is published by Esheria. Coverage reflects the case law currently mapped from identified source collections; it may be incomplete, delayed, or later corrected. The official source controls where it differs from this research page.

AI and research method

Source-derived facts are shown separately from AI-generated material. If an AI summary is available, it is explicitly labelled and remains a non-authoritative research aid.

Corrections and reporting

Report a source mismatch, factual issue, personal-data concern, or licensing question to support@esheria.co.ke. Include this page's URL and the supporting official source so the record can be reviewed, corrected, restricted, or withdrawn.

Legal-information disclaimer

LexChat provides legal information and research tools, not legal advice. Verify currency, status, citations, and jurisdiction with authoritative sources and a qualified professional where appropriate.