Gregory Projects (Halifax) Ltd v Tenpin (Halifax) Ltd & Anor
The Unconditional Date occurred before the End Date because the Planning Condition was satisfied upon the grant of planning permission with the requisite characteristics, and procedural requirements such as clause 2.6 did not constitute conditions precedent to satisfaction of the Planning Condition.
- Parties
- Claimant: Gregory Projects (Halifax) Ltd; Defendant: Tenpin (Halifax) Ltd; Defendant: Tenpin Ltd
- Jurisdiction
- England and Wales
- Judgment Date
- 27 October 2009
- Procedural Posture
- Civil / Judgment
- Outcome
- claim allowed
- Legal Topics
- Agreement for Lease, Rescission, Conditionality, Interpretation of Contract
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Gregory Projects (Halifax) Ltd
Claimant
Tenpin (Halifax) Ltd
Defendant
Tenpin Ltd
Defendant
Procedural Posture
Civil / Judgment
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether Tenpin was entitled to rescind the agreement for lease under clause 4.1
- 2 Whether the Planning Condition was satisfied before the End Date
- 3 Interpretation of 'Unconditional Date' and procedural requirements
Ratio Decidendi
The Unconditional Date occurred before the End Date because the Planning Condition was satisfied upon the grant of planning permission with the requisite characteristics, and procedural requirements such as clause 2.6 did not constitute conditions precedent to satisfaction of the Planning Condition.
Court Disposition
claim allowed
Orders
- Declarations that the Unconditional Date occurred before the End Date and Tenpin was not entitled to rescind when it purported to do so.
- Dismissal of the Part 20 claim.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment