Conaghan, R. v
Applications for leave to appeal, extensions of time, and admission of fresh evidence were refused due to lack of merit, failure to meet legal criteria, and inexcusable delay. Assistance by non-qualified third parties is only permitted in exceptional circumstances. Loss of time orders are appropriate to deter unmeritorious applications.
- Parties
- Prosecution: Regina; Applicant: Terence Conaghan; Applicant: Thomas William Henry James; Applicant: David Noel Ramchaitar; Applicant: Michael Herbert Solomon
- Jurisdiction
- England and Wales
- Judgment Date
- 28 February 2017
- Procedural Posture
- Criminal Appeal / Renewed Applications for Leave to Appeal Against Conviction
- Outcome
- Applications for extension of time, leave to appeal, and admission of fresh evidence refused.
- Legal Topics
- Rights of Audience, Assistance by Third Parties, Extension of Time, Fresh Evidence, Loss of Time Orders
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Regina
Prosecution
Terence Conaghan
Applicant
Thomas William Henry James
Applicant
David Noel Ramchaitar
Applicant
Michael Herbert Solomon
Applicant
Procedural Posture
Criminal Appeal / Renewed Applications for Leave to Appeal Against Conviction
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether non-legally qualified third parties may assist or represent applicants in the Court of Appeal Criminal Division
- 2 Whether extensions of time for leave to appeal should be granted
- 3 Whether fresh evidence should be admitted on appeal
Ratio Decidendi
Applications for leave to appeal, extensions of time, and admission of fresh evidence were refused due to lack of merit, failure to meet legal criteria, and inexcusable delay. Assistance by non-qualified third parties is only permitted in exceptional circumstances. Loss of time orders are appropriate to deter unmeritorious applications.
Court Disposition
Applications for extension of time, leave to appeal, and admission of fresh evidence refused.
Orders
- Loss of time order of 28 days made against James and Solomon.
- No loss of time order made against Conaghan and Ramchaitar due to circumstances.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment