Cunningham & Ors v R.
The sentences imposed were manifestly excessive given the appellants' roles, mitigation, and precedent. Proper starting points should have been lower, with full credit for guilty pleas applied. The appeals against sentence are allowed and sentences reduced accordingly.
Source-derived case information.
- Parties
- Appellant: Terence Cunningham; Appellant: William Adams; Appellant: Terence James Cunningham; Respondent: Regina
- Jurisdiction
- England and Wales
- Judgment Date
- 04 December 2015
- Procedural Posture
- Criminal Appeal / Judgment on Appeal Against Sentence
- Outcome
- appeals allowed in part
- Legal Topics
- Conspiracy to Blackmail, Sentencing, Mitigation, Credit for Guilty Plea, Director Disqualification, Serious Crime Prevention Order
Source-derived case record
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Terence Cunningham
Appellant
William Adams
Appellant
Terence James Cunningham
Appellant
Regina
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Criminal Appeal / Judgment on Appeal Against Sentence
Legal Issues
- 1 whether sentences imposed for conspiracy to blackmail were manifestly excessive
- 2 proper starting point for sentencing given aggravating and mitigating factors
- 3 application of credit for guilty plea
Ratio Decidendi
The sentences imposed were manifestly excessive given the appellants' roles, mitigation, and precedent. Proper starting points should have been lower, with full credit for guilty pleas applied. The appeals against sentence are allowed and sentences reduced accordingly.
Court Disposition
appeals allowed in part
Orders
- sentence of 8 years and 6 months for William Adams quashed and substituted with 6 years and 9 months
- sentence of 8 years and 6 months for Terence Cunningham quashed and substituted with 6 years
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment