Round & Anor v R

Round & Anor v R

It is not wrong in principle for a sentencing judge to structure consecutive sentences in the natural or conventional order, even if this results in anomalies in HDC eligibility due to differing statutory regimes. Sentencers are not required to adjust the order or structure of sentences to maximise or harmonise early release possibilities, as these are matters for statute and executive discretion, not for judicial manipulation.

Parties
Appellant: Terence Round; Appellant: Vincent David Dunn; Respondent: The Queen; Interested Party: The Secretary of State for Justice
Jurisdiction
England and Wales
Judgment Date
16 December 2009
Procedural Posture
Criminal Appeal / Appeal Against Sentence
Outcome
Appeals dismissed
Legal Topics
Home Detention Curfew (hdc), Consecutive Sentences, Early Release, Statutory Interpretation, Judicial Discretion
Criminal Law Sentencing Home Detention Curfew (hdc) Consecutive Sentences Early Release Statutory Interpretation Judicial Discretion

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 3 Authorities cited 13 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 4
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Terence Round

Appellant

Vincent David Dunn

Appellant

The Queen

Respondent

The Secretary of State for Justice

Interested Party

Procedural Posture

Criminal Appeal / Appeal Against Sentence

Legal Issues

  1. 1 Whether sentencing judges must structure consecutive sentences to maximise eligibility for Home Detention Curfew (HDC) under differing statutory regimes
  2. 2 Whether the order of consecutive sentences should be altered to benefit the defendant regarding HDC eligibility
  3. 3 Whether early release and licence provisions are relevant considerations in structuring sentences

Ratio Decidendi

It is not wrong in principle for a sentencing judge to structure consecutive sentences in the natural or conventional order, even if this results in anomalies in HDC eligibility due to differing statutory regimes. Sentencers are not required to adjust the order or structure of sentences to maximise or harmonise early release possibilities, as these are matters for statute and executive discretion, not for judicial manipulation.

Court Disposition

Appeals dismissed