Goshawk Aviation Ltd & Ors v Terra Aviation Network S.A.S. & Ors
The Moulder Order for alternative service must be set aside as the court lacked jurisdiction to make such an order without granting permission to serve out. However, there was and remains good reason to permit alternative service and, if necessary, to extend time for service. The court will grant permission to serve out and order that steps already taken shall constitute good service. Each side to bear its own costs of the first application.
- Parties
- Claimant: Goshawk Aviation Limited; Claimant: Pioneer Aircraft Leasing One Limited; Claimant: Myna Leasing Three Limited; Claimant: Myna Leasing Limited; Claimant: Arcadia Leasing 1 Limited; Claimant: Arcadia Leasing 2 Limited; Claimant: Jetair 14 Limited; Claimant: Jetair 15 Limited; Claimant: Kapuas Aviation Leasing Limited; Defendant: Terra Aviation Network S.A.S.; Defendant: PT Lion Mentari Tbk; Defendant: Thai Lion Mentari Co. Ltd; Defendant: PT Langit Esa Oktagon; Defendant: Ciel Voyage S.A.S.
- Jurisdiction
- England and Wales
- Judgment Date
- 23 April 2021
- Procedural Posture
- Commercial Court Claim / Interlocutory Application—setting Aside Service, Alternative Service, Extension of Time, Costs
- Outcome
- Application to set aside service allowed; alternative service and extension of time to be granted; costs of first application—each party to bear own costs.
- Legal Topics
- Service of Process, Alternative Service, Jurisdiction, Extension of Time, Costs Orders
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Goshawk Aviation Limited
Claimant
Pioneer Aircraft Leasing One Limited
Claimant
Myna Leasing Three Limited
Claimant
Myna Leasing Limited
Claimant
Arcadia Leasing 1 Limited
Claimant
Arcadia Leasing 2 Limited
Claimant
Jetair 14 Limited
Claimant
Jetair 15 Limited
Claimant
Kapuas Aviation Leasing Limited
Claimant
Terra Aviation Network S.A.S.
Defendant
PT Lion Mentari Tbk
Defendant
Thai Lion Mentari Co. Ltd
Defendant
PT Langit Esa Oktagon
Defendant
Ciel Voyage S.A.S.
Defendant
Procedural Posture
Commercial Court Claim / Interlocutory Application—setting Aside Service, Alternative Service, Extension of Time, Costs
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the court should set aside service of the Claim Form on the Second and Third Defendants
- 2 Whether there was good reason for alternative service under CPR 6.15
- 3 Whether the Moulder Order was valid without permission to serve out
Ratio Decidendi
The Moulder Order for alternative service must be set aside as the court lacked jurisdiction to make such an order without granting permission to serve out. However, there was and remains good reason to permit alternative service and, if necessary, to extend time for service. The court will grant permission to serve out and order that steps already taken shall constitute good service. Each side to bear its own costs of the first application.
Court Disposition
Application to set aside service allowed; alternative service and extension of time to be granted; costs of first application—each party to bear own costs.
Orders
- Moulder Order for alternative service set aside
- Permission to serve out of the jurisdiction to be granted
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment